"H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> writes: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> The ELF note format is sane enough, although it looks like it's not >>> self-terminating, so we'd either need an offset and a length field, or >>> adopt the convention that namesz = descsz = type = 0 terminates the >>> block (I prefer the latter, myself.) >> >> Hm, I think offset+length would be better: it's how they're represented >> in a normal ELF file, so you can just extract the length if you're >> extracting the notes. Also, generating a terminating note with the >> current linker-based notes machinery would be a bit of a pain. > > .notes : { > *(.note.*) > . = ALIGN(4); > LONG(0); > LONG(0); > LONG(0); > } > > Am I missing something? I don't think adding a length any harder. The all zero note is reserved so using it this way should be ok. Regardless this sounds like a sane thing to be looking at. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 setup: correct booting on 486 (revised)
- Index(es):