Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:45:39AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
>  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>  #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
>  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> -#include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
>  #include <asm/atomic.h>
>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>

ACK the part that nothing needs sched.h, but it shouldn't change anything,
because of interrupt.h => hardirq.h => smp_lock.h => sched.h dependency.

[puts patch on cross-compile farm anyway]
[starts finding scalpels]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
  - From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
  - From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Devel] [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take 2)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: add filter function to groups
Previous by thread: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]