Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h

Em Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:12:10PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:45:39AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> > @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> >  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> > -#include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
> >  #include <asm/atomic.h>
> >  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> 
> ACK the part that nothing needs sched.h, but it shouldn't change anything,
> because of interrupt.h => hardirq.h => smp_lock.h => sched.h dependency.

Yeah, but one thing at a time, now its one link in the maze, before it
was two :-)
 
> [puts patch on cross-compile farm anyway]
> [starts finding scalpels]

Thanks!

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
    • From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
• Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/2] usb_gigaset: suspend support
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]