On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:58 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> >> > struct attribute_group {
> >> > const char *name;
> >> > + int (*filter_show)(struct kobject *, int);
>
> > Actually, it returns a true/false value indicating whether the given
> > attribute should be displayed.
>
> How about this:
>
> int (*is_visible)(...);
> or
> bool (*shall_be_shown)(...);
> or
> bool (*should_be_displayed)(...);
>
> or whatever, so that it indicates that this function merely answers a
> question, but doesn't filter nor show anything.
Actually, as long as it's descriptive, I really don't care about the
name. Can we all agree on "is_visible"?
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
