Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:24:30 +1100
Cc: [email protected], LKML <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That was already fixed AFAICT.

Not in Linus' tree, yet.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpfNZcLdnRC4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
  - From: Olof Johansson <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
  - From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection
Next by Date: Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux