Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:24:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > That was already fixed AFAICT.
> 
> Not in Linus' tree, yet.

Nope, it's still sitting in -mm. Al Viro just posted the same fix too.


-Olof
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
    • From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [SUNRPC] endianness annotations
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: nr_slabs is an atomic_long_t
• Next by thread: [PATCH] [CIFS] Silence two "defined but unused" warning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]