Re: [PATCH 1/3] VFS: apply coding standards to fs/ioctl.c

On 10/28/07, Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> While you're at it, it's probably worth splitting this out into
> a small helper function.

Why? Is the same pattern called from more than one place?

Regards,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] VFS: apply coding standards to fs/ioctl.c
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] 0/3 fs/ioctl.c coding style, rename vfs_ioctl/do_ioctl
  - From: Erez Zadok <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/3] VFS: apply coding standards to fs/ioctl.c
  - From: Erez Zadok <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] VFS: apply coding standards to fs/ioctl.c
  - From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [M68KNOMMU]: new style ColdFire UART driver
Next by Date: [PATCH] Silence radeon_pm warning
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] VFS: apply coding standards to fs/ioctl.c
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] VFS: apply coding standards to fs/ioctl.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]