This series of three proposed patches changes fs/ioctl.c and Unionfs as
follows. This series is against v2.6.24-rc1-192-gef49c32.
Patch 1: just applies coding standards to fs/ioctl.c (while I'm at it, I
figured it's worth cleaning VFS files one at a time).
Patch 2: does two things:
(a) Renames the old vfs_ioctl to do_ioctl, because the comment above the old
vfs_ioctl clearly indicates that it is an internal function not to be
exported to modules; therefore it should have a more traditional do_XXX
"internal function" name. The new do_ioctl is exported in fs.h but not
to modules.
(b) Renames the old (static) do_ioctl to vfs_ioctl because the names vfs_XXX
should preferably be reserved to callable VFS functions which modules
may call, as other vfs_XXX functions already do. Export the new
vfs_ioctl to modules so others can use it (including Unionfs and
eCryptfs).
Patch 3: demonstrates how Unionfs can use the new vfs_ioctl. I successfully
tested unionfs with this new exported vfs_ioctl. (eCryptfs could do the
same.)
I'd like to propose that the first two patches be merged in -mm and even
mainline, pending review.
Erez Zadok (3):
VFS: apply coding standards to fs/ioctl.c
VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names
Unionfs: use vfs_ioctl
fs/compat_ioctl.c | 2
fs/ioctl.c | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
fs/unionfs/commonfops.c | 22 +-----
include/linux/fs.h | 3
Cheers,
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
