Am 28.10.2007 10:25 schrieb Stefan Richter: > You two are hypothesizing. No, we're not. We're discussing the very real issue of whether LSM should be amputated in such a way as to make life difficult for out of tree security module developers. > - We (most of us) change APIs to improve the kernel. That's good. If that was consensus then this discussion would not be necessary. What I am protesting against is attempts to change the API purposely to obstruct out-of-tree code. That is not a way to improve the kernel. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: [email protected] Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- References:
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: "Simon Arlott" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework)
- From: Tilman Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules (was: : Linux Security *Module* Framework)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] proc_fs.h redux
- Next by Date: [PATCH] usbserial: fix inconsistent lock state
- Previous by thread: Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- Next by thread: Re: eradicating out of tree modules
- Index(es):
 |