On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:46:15 -0600
[email protected] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> yeah and THEY can put the defines in (RH used to do this fwiw as a
> >> generic "this is a RH kernel" define)....
> >>
> >> but afaik no distro vendor backports such an api change
> >> nowadays... and hasn't in 2.6 ever
> >
> > People backport drivers all the time that must support a wide range
> > of kernels.
>
> I thought the argument was not that drivers are back ported but that
> internal kernel APIs changes aren't backported.
exactly
> So that testing
> the kernel version actually has a chance as a reasonable test for
> features.
or at least for this level of API change
For this specific change, I don't see ANY distro just backporting
this ... so a version test is just fine for this change imo.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [email protected]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
