On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:47:58 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > That was a goofup. I proposed that we should add a #define
> > TWO_ARG_IRQ_HANDLERS (or whatever) and I think I actually wrote the
> > patch, but it got lost.
> >
> > I agree it would be a kind thing to do in this case.
>
>
> Yep, I was thinking that including
>
> #define IRQ_HANDLER_V3
>
> would be a good idea.
>
it sets a certain precedent though.... we don't do this for the 500
other API changes we do each release (see stable-api-nonsense)... so
this one is mostly arbitrary picked out
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [email protected]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
