Re: Fwd: x86_64 and AMD with C1E

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So if the
> > number of hpet channels is greater/equal to the number of possible
> > CPUs it's perfectly fine and does not need IPI at all.
> That is only a stop gap then. I don't see this being
> generally true in the future. e.g. Intel announced SMT will be soon 
> back so even a standard dual core would exceed it with
> current southbridges.

Sigh. We have to deal with current hardware and the problems of exactly 
that hardware. We have the possibility to solve problems and witchcrafting 
what might happen next is not a good reason not to do so.

> Also I'm not sure but I suspect non Intel HPETs have less than
> three timers. Certainly they generally miss the 64bitness.

two timers are enough and 64 bit is nice to have, but not a requirement.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux