Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional

Hi Andreas,

On Friday 28 September 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So why not name it path_walk_put_pair() then?

Rationale: "_both" is just counting, "_pair" 
	means they are related somehow.


Best regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 00/10] Use struct path in struct nameidata
  - From: [email protected]
- [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
  - From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.23-rc8-mm2] kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:591! | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: Printing numbers in parentheses is fine
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
Next by thread: [PATCH -mm1 0/2] Fix unlocked call to idr_find()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]