This is a respin of the patch series Andreas posted last month. It leaves out the restructuring of the intent which will be done at a later point in time. There are three preparing patches that remove unneeded code IMHO. I haven't got feedback from Takashi since he is on holiday. Please, can somebody else acknowledge the changes? Comments? Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
- From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
- [patch 10/10] Make set_fs_{root,pwd} take a struct path
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 05/10] Embed a struct path into struct nameidata instead of nd->{dentry,mnt}
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 06/10] Introduce path_put()
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 09/10] Use struct path in fs_struct
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 07/10] Use path_put() in a few places instead of {mnt,d}put()
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 01/10] Dont touch fs_struct in drivers
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 08/10] Introduce path_get()
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 04/10] Move struct path into its own header
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper
- From: [email protected]
- [patch 03/10] Remove path_release_on_umount()
- From: [email protected]
- [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
- Prev by Date: [patch 03/10] Remove path_release_on_umount()
- Next by Date: [patch 02/10] Dont touch fs_struct in usermodehelper
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] JBD2: debug code cleanup.
- Next by thread: [patch 03/10] Remove path_release_on_umount()
- Index(es):
 |