Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:43:50PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Here is another cleanup on top of Jan's set. Comments?
> 
> 
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).

I think this function is a good idea.  The name seems odd to me, but
I don't really have a better idea either.

> +static void path_walk_put_both(struct path *path1, struct path *path2)
> +{
> +	dput(path1->dentry);
> +	dput(path2->dentry);
> +	mntput(path1->mnt);
> +	if (path1->mnt != path2->mnt)
> +		mntput(path2->mnt);
>  }

Why do you opencode the path_put for path1?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/10] Use struct path in struct nameidata
    • From: [email protected]
  • [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
    • From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 09/10] Use struct path in fs_struct
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 09/10] Use struct path in fs_struct
• Previous by thread: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]