Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class

* Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 24/09/2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
> >
> > I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> >
> > Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
> >
> >
> > The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
> > "do not leak PI boosting priority to the child" at the sched_fork().
> > This patch moves the adjusting sched_class from wake_up_new_task()
> > to sched_fork().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>

thanks - i've picked up Hiroshi's cleanup.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
  - From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
  - From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH/RFC] samples/: move kprobes sources to samples
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu array v3
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]