Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 24/09/2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
> >
> > I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> >
> > Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
> >
> >
> > The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
> > "do not leak PI boosting priority to the child" at the sched_fork().
> > This patch moves the adjusting sched_class from wake_up_new_task()
> > to sched_fork().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>

thanks - i've picked up Hiroshi's cleanup.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux