Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class

On 24/09/2007, Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
>
> I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.

thanks!

>
> Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
>
>
> The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing
> "do not leak PI boosting priority to the child" at the sched_fork().
> This patch moves the adjusting sched_class from wake_up_new_task()
> to sched_fork().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>


-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
    • From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [git] CFS-devel, latest code
• Next by Date: Re: HSM violation with ahci+WDC WD1600BEVS-22RST0
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]