Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class

* Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Ingo and Dmitry,
> 
> I made a clean-up patch about fixing invalid sched_class use.
> 
> Dmitry, could you please review and sign it?
> 
> 
> The adjusting sched_class is a missing part of the already existing 
> "do not leak PI boosting priority to the child" at the sched_fork(). 
> This patch moves the adjusting sched_class from wake_up_new_task() to 
> sched_fork().

thanks. Note that your cleanup also shrinks the code a bit:

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
  40111    4018     292   44421    ad85 sched.o.before
  40102    4018     292   44412    ad7c sched.o.after

which never hurts :)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
    • From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [37/50] Fix inet_diag OOPS.
• Next by Date: Re: sys_chroot+sys_fchdir Fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: cleanup adjusting sched_class
• Next by thread: /proc/kallsyms and symbol size
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]