Hi Valdis,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, [email protected] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:16:28 EDT, Kyle Moffett said:
>
> > I am assuming that if the laptop has sufficiently important data on
> > it to warrant the above steps then I am also clueful enough to:
> > (A) Not carry the laptop around unsecured areas,
> > (B) Keep a close enough eye on it and be aware that it's gone by
> > the time they get to step 2, OR
> > (C) Pay somebody to build me a better physical chassis for my laptop
>
> Building a better chassis can be a challenge when the threat model really
> *does* include attacks by a well-funded TLA.
>
> http://www.epic.org/crypto/scarfo/murch_aff.pdf
Thanks for the link! And this was ... 1999 (!) Probably goes without
saying that physical hacking tricks have only become even more refined/
perfected by now :-)
> The FBI did an *initial* entry to survey the hardware, and then a total of
> *five* other entries before they actually installed it. Note the technical
> and legal requirements required on the KLS (it had to, among other things,
> capture PGP passphrases but *not* anything that was typed online).
Thanks,
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
