Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:02:00AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

on UDP/RAW and it's certainly possible to connect() to that.

Where do you get this from?  And where is this implemented?  I don't


Sorry it's actually loopback, not broadcast as implemented in Linux.
In Linux it's implemented in ip_route_output_slow(). Essentially
converted to 127.0.0.1

I think it's traditional BSD behaviour but couldn't find it on
a quick look in FreeBSD source (but haven't looked very intensively)

One has to set their way-back machine pretty far back to find the *BSD bits which used 0.0.0.0 as the "all nets, all subnets" (to mis-use a term) broadcast IPv4 address when sending. Perhaps as far back as the time before HP-UX 7 or SunOS4. The bit errors in my dimm memory get pretty dense that far back...

It has hung-on in various places (stacks) as an "accepted" broadcast IP in the receive path, but not the send path for quite possibly decades now.

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux