Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX

[Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andi Kleen wrote:
> The standard way to undo connect is to use AF_UNSPEC. Code to handle
> that for dgram sockets is there. It's the same code for v4 and v6.

I quoted the standard and it does not say anything about AF_UNSPEC.  So
you cannot simply make such broad statements.

I also don't say that this behavior should be removed.  It's certainly
useful, very much so in fact.

But the spec calls for a "null address" to be used and that's in my
understanding something different from using AF_UNSPEC.

I looked through Stevens TCP Illustrated Vol 2 and it seems not to
mention resetting the address at all.  The POSIX spec certainly got this
text from .1g.

I cannot test it on other systems.  If somebody has access to some
certified systems (and maybe others), write a bit of code which creates
a DGRAM socket, connect to one address, call connect with a "null
address", then connect to another address (which likely has to use a
different interface since otherwise the connect will just succeed, it
seems).

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG8VMF2ijCOnn/RHQRAr9NAJwLxyql0kQnMGJNaPZlRGsuB6rGEACgog88
WIWAFhuBWsjps7PdbcoumUQ=
=oLxP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/