Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:20:18 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 07:14:47AM -0700, David Wilder wrote:
> > I agree with you; however, this is in the example code in the 
> > Documentation directory,  It is not part of the trace code.  The example 
> > was just meant to be a demonstration of how the interface works.
> 
> So we tell people to write bad code?  Wonderful..
> 
> And while we're at it can we please stop the dumb idea to put example
> code into Documentation?  If example code doesn't get build during a
> make oldconfig it will bitrot real fast and not be useful at all.


That's why they exmaples should not be hidden/embedded in .txt files;
they should be standalone .c files with makefiles etc.

I've built and corrected several of them, but they would be more
likely to be kept up-to-date if they are more available in standalone
files.

and they can be taken out of Documentation/ whenever they go into
util-linux-ng or elsewhere.  Let's get the order correct.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux