Re: [Patch 1/2] Trace code and documentation (updated)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:20:18 +0100 Christoph Hellwig wrote:

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 07:14:47AM -0700, David Wilder wrote:
I agree with you; however, this is in the example code in the Documentation directory, It is not part of the trace code. The example was just meant to be a demonstration of how the interface works.
So we tell people to write bad code?  Wonderful..

And while we're at it can we please stop the dumb idea to put example
code into Documentation?  If example code doesn't get build during a
make oldconfig it will bitrot real fast and not be useful at all.


That's why they exmaples should not be hidden/embedded in .txt files;
they should be standalone .c files with makefiles etc.

I've built and corrected several of them, but they would be more
likely to be kept up-to-date if they are more available in standalone
files.

and they can be taken out of Documentation/ whenever they go into
util-linux-ng or elsewhere.  Let's get the order correct.

---
~Randy

IMHO keeping example code as standalone files under Documentation/* make it easy to build an play with. I like it better than keeping it on some project website where it is even less likely to maintained.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux