On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Kyle Moffett wrote: > > So you can't draw any relationships between "Protect the end-user" with > "Protect the device FROM the end-user", the former can be done very reliably ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ *attacker* > to whatever level of risk-reduction you need and the latter can't practically > be done at all. Well, you're the one who called solving the physical access problem "easy" here ... :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- Prev by Date: Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] UML - Fix irqstack crash
- Previous by thread: Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- Next by thread: Re: NFS4 authentification / fsuid
- Index(es):
 |