Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1

[Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org>]

Hi Borislav,


On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:01:21PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > >> +#define DMA_64BIT_MASK	DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
> > >>     
> > >
> > > This one does not do what you mean. You need an explicit mask or a
> > > ~0ULL here.
> > 
> > Yeah, I was just about to comment on it.  Its possible the compiler
> > might decide to shift by x%64 = 0.
> > 
> >     J
> ups, i knew that this might be a corner/boundary case. Thanks, updated patches
> follow...

Please fold all three patches into a single patch in the updated series,
otherwise git bisecters falling in between these patches will see the
"redefinition ... previous definition was here" warnings of gcc ...


Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/