Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1

On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:01:21PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >> +#define DMA_64BIT_MASK	DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
> >>     
> >
> > This one does not do what you mean. You need an explicit mask or a
> > ~0ULL here.
> 
> Yeah, I was just about to comment on it.  Its possible the compiler
> might decide to shift by x%64 = 0.
> 
>     J
ups, i knew that this might be a corner/boundary case. Thanks, updated patches
follow...
-- 
Regards/Gruß,
    Boris.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1
    • From: Satyam Sharma <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1
    • From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1
    • From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]