Re: [PATCH 0/2] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v1

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>]

Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>> +#define DMA_64BIT_MASK	DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
>>     
>
> This one does not do what you mean. You need an explicit mask or a
> ~0ULL here.

Yeah, I was just about to comment on it.  Its possible the compiler
might decide to shift by x%64 = 0.

    J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/