On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 20:17:28 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 9 2007 17:49, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>
> >> Question: Why are only Intel CPUs considered as stable? Could
> >> there be implemented a more sophisticated heuristic, that actually
> >> does some tests for tsc stability?
> >
> >on AMD multi-socket systems, afaik the tsc is not synchronized
> >between packages. On Intel the tsc is derived from the FSB which is
> >shared between the packages.
>
> Also, the TSC is not necessarily constant wrt. CPU clock speed.
> If your program stalls, the core may reduce frequency and hence
> TSC values are not linear to time anymore.
>
that depends on the CPU generation; most current cpus have
constant-rate tscs (at least constant wrt their own concept of time,
but at least independent of cpu frequency)...
it gets more iffy on idle; on deep idle the tsc tends to stop ;(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
