On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 03:55:37 +0200, Adrian Bunk said: > Jiri's patch would have wrongly not only removed the BSD statement from > dual licenced files but also from not dual licenced files. > > This was a mistake in this patch (that was never merged into the tree) > neither Jiri nor Alan noticed. You know, we *could* have solved this a *hell* of a lot easier if people quit flaming about it, and we did something *productive* instead. Like submit a corrected patch. :)
Attachment:
pgpyv7EFx7cSL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <[email protected]>
- Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- References:
- Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Jason Dixon <[email protected]>
- Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- Next by thread: Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
- Index(es):