Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags

On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 22:46 -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>         */
>         if (task == current) return 0;
>  
> -       if ((task->state != TASK_STOPPED) && (task->state !=
> TASK_TRACED)) {
> +       if (!is_task_stopped_or_traced(task->state)) {
>                 DPRINT(("cannot attach to non-stopped task [%d] state=
> -               if ((task->state != TASK_STOPPED) && (task->state !=
> TASK_TRACED)) {
> +               if (!is_task_stopped_or_traced(task)) {
>                         DPRINT(("[%d] task not in stopped state\n",
> task->pid));
>                         return -EBUSY;
>                 } 

Does it take task->state or task ?

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] TASK_KILLABLE version 2
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: the Linux kernel, testsuites, and maybe *you*
• Next by Date: Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]