On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Aug 31 2007 18:02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> it may be that some people had a different understanding of what was
> >> meant by "maturity" than i did. what *i* meant by that attribute is
> >> a feature's current position in the normal software life cycle, and
> >> that would be one of:
> >>
> >> experimental -> normal (stable) -> deprecated -> obsolete
> >
> > People who actually write and maintain code disagree with your imaginative
> > interpretation.
>
> Might I point to the "designers and builders" thread...
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/279 :)
i'm trying to figure out whether i fall into the "insane" or the
"hmmm, interesting, we'll get back to you" camp. :-)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZF3r5lAvhYI
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
