Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 31 2007 18:02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>   it may be that some people had a different understanding of what was
>> meant by "maturity" than i did.  what *i* meant by that attribute is
>> a feature's current position in the normal software life cycle, and
>> that would be one of:
>> 
>>   experimental -> normal (stable) -> deprecated -> obsolete
>
> People who actually write and maintain code disagree with your imaginative
> interpretation.

Might I point to the "designers and builders" thread... 
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/279 :)


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux