Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
> attributes would have two critical and non-negotiable properties:
> 
> 1) they would be entirely orthogonal to one another, and
> 2) they can be assigned at most one of a pre-defined set of values

If they are fully orthogonal to another, then they are also
nonexclusive.  You want them to be mutual exclusive, not orthogonal.

...
>   experimental -> normal (stable) -> deprecated -> obsolete
> 
>   it's a natural progression and, at any point, a feature cannot
> possibly have more than one maturity value.  it would be as absurd as
> saying that someone was a teenager *and* was a twenty-something at the
> same time.

Keep in mind though that 'experimental', in the context of Linux kernel
features, has nothing to do with the age of a feature.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== =--= ----=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux