On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 06:51:16PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:16:43 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said: > > > I agree that instant gratification is hard to come by when synching > > up compiler and kernel versions. Nonetheless, it should be possible > > to create APIs that are are conditioned on the compiler version. > > We've tried that, sort of. See the mess surrounding the whole > extern/static/inline/__whatever boondogle, which seems to have > changed semantics in every single gcc release since 2.95 or so. > > And recently mention was made that gcc4.4 will have *new* semantics > in this area. Yee. Hah. ;-) Thanx, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Prev by Date: Re: How to learn Linux Kernel Programming
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ver_linux is [censored]
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Index(es):
![]() |