On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:04:17AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > And no, RMW on MMIO isn't "problematic" at all, either. > > An RMW op is a read op, a modify op, and a write op, all rolled > into one opcode. But three actual operations. Maybe for some CPUs, but not all. ARM for instance can't use the load exclusive and store exclusive instructions to MMIO space. This means placing atomic_t or bitops into MMIO space is a definite no-go on ARM. It breaks. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ensure we don't use bootconsoles after init has been released
- Next by Date: [patch 01/14] Convert from class_device to device for block/paride
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures
- Index(es):
![]() |