* Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ingo's latest 'not quite noatime' seems to cure mutt/tmpwatch so it > > might finally make sense to do so. > > Do we report max(ctime, mtime) as the atime by default when noatime is > set or do we still need that to be done? noatime is unchanged by my patch (it is not the same as the 'improved relatime' mode my patch activates), but it would make sense to do your change, independently. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Prev by Date: Re: Oops on 2.6.21 + DRBD + XFS
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix bug in balance_tasks()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Index(es):
 |