Linus Torvalds wrote:
The "relatime" thing that David mentioned might well be very useful, but it's probably even less used than "noatime" is. And sadly, I don't really see that changing (unless we were to actually change the defaults inside the kernel).
I actually vote for that. IMO, distros should turn -on- atime updates when they know its needed.
Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- References:
- [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Documentation/make/headers_install.txt
- Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: many problems with mac80211, iwlwifi and ACPI on Santa Rosa laptop
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
- Index(es):
 |