Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8

On 08/06/2007 03:37 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> We already tried that here. The response: "If noatime is so great, why
>> isn't it the default in the kernel?"
> 
> Ok so we have a pile of people @redhat.com sitting on linux-kernel
> complaining about Red Hat distributions not taking it up. Guys - can
> we just fix it internally please like sensible folk ?
> 
> Ingo's latest 'not quite noatime' seems to cure mutt/tmpwatch so it might
> finally make sense to do so.

Do we report max(ctime, mtime) as the atime by default when noatime
is set or do we still need that to be done?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] Off-by-one in /sys/module/*/refcnt
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]