Matthew, odd off. ait binary crap is totally offtopic here on the list, and beeing prude for beeing a fuckhead and holding development back doesn't exactly helpe either. Go back to your -ck fanboy land and shut up now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: "Matthew Hawkins" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- From: "Matthew Hawkins" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
- Prev by Date: [rft] Kill junk from s2ram resume paths
- Next by Date: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?
- Index(es):
 |