KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Could we discuss this in other thread as "optimization for some cpus" and push bug-fix patches first ? If take5 or part of take6(patch 1,2) are not acceptable, I'll continue this work on -rc2. Thanks, -Kame
Sure. Thanks, Zoltan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [0/4]
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
- [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
- Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
- From: "David Mosberger-Tang" <dmosberger@gmail.com>
- Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
- From: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>
- Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
- [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [0/4]
- Prev by Date: Re: acpi=off vs. blacklist
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/4][RFC] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
- Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito
- Index(es):
 |