Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:38:48 +0200
Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net> wrote:

> David Mosberger-Tang wrote:
> > This seems crazy to me.  Flushing should occur according to the
> > *architecture*, not model-by-model.  Even if we happen to get "lucky"
> > on pre-Montecito CPUs, that doesn't justify such ugly hacks.  Or you
> > really want to debug this *again* come next CPU?
> > 
> >   --david
> 
> O.K. let's say we flush by default: the global flag is set.
> 
> We can have a (short) list of the CPU models which do not require
> this flush.
> 
> If all of the CPUs are on the list then clear the global flag. And:
> 
> static inline void sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pte) {
>        if (pte_exec(pte) && global_flag)
>                __sync_icache_dcache(pte);
> }
> 

Could we discuss this in other thread as "optimization for some cpus" and
push bug-fix patches first ?

If take5 or part of take6(patch 1,2) are not acceptable, I'll continue this
work on -rc2.

Thanks,
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/