Matthew Hawkins wrote:
updatedb by itself doesn't really bug me, its just that on occasionits still running at 7am
You should start it earlier then - assuming it doesn't already start at the earliest opportunity? Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Frank Kingswood <frank@kingswood-consulting.co.uk>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: [ck] Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: "Matthew Hawkins" <darthmdh@gmail.com>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: checkpatch.pl false positive on exported pointers
- Next by Date: Re: serial flow control appears broken
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Next by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Index(es):
 |