On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:47:49 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > More sophisticated testing is needed - there's something in > ext3-tools which will mmap, page in and hold a file for you. So much for that theory. afaict mmapped, active pagecache is immune to updatedb activity. It just sits there while updatedb continues munching away at the slab and blockdev pagecache which it instantiated. I assume we're never getting the VM into enough trouble to tip it over the start-reclaiming-mapped-pages threshold (ie: /proc/sys/vm/swappiness). Start the updatedb on this 128MB machine with 80MB of mapped pagecache, it falls to 55MB fairly soon and then never changes. So hrm. Are we sure that updatedb is the problem? There are quite a few heavyweight things which happen in the wee small hours. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- References:
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Frank Kingswood <frank@kingswood-consulting.co.uk>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
- Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] nfs: fix locking in nfs/inode.c in nfs_free_open_context
- Previous by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Next by thread: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23]
- Index(es):
![]() |