On Thursday 26 July 2007 10:01:11 Rene Herman wrote:
> On 07/26/2007 09:08 AM, Bongani Hlope wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:56:59 Rene Herman wrote:
> >> Great. Now concentrate on the "swpd" column, as it's the only thing
> >> relevant here. The fact that an updatedb run fills/replaces caches is
> >> completely and utterly unsurprising and not something swap-prefetch
> >> helps with. The only thing it does is bring back stuff from _swap_.
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > I have 2Gb of RAM and I never ever touched swap on all my work loads. I
> > was just showing the behavior of updatedb on my desktop. I have never
> > even looked at the swap-prefetch patch (for obvious reasons).
>
> I see... thanks for the report :)
>
> > I think people should also look at their /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio
>
> In the sense that current stuff might be evicted earlier with no or little
> overcommit?
>
Oops, that was suppose to be /proc/sys/vm/swappiness Sorry about the
confusion.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
