Re: updatedb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/26/2007 09:08 AM, Bongani Hlope wrote:

On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:56:59 Rene Herman wrote:

Great. Now concentrate on the "swpd" column, as it's the only thing relevant here. The fact that an updatedb run fills/replaces caches is completely and utterly unsurprising and not something swap-prefetch
helps with. The only thing it does is bring back stuff from _swap_.

;)

I have 2Gb of RAM and I never ever touched swap on all my work loads. I
was just showing the behavior of updatedb on my desktop. I have never
even looked at the swap-prefetch patch (for obvious reasons).

I see... thanks for the report :)

I think people should also look at their /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_ratio

In the sense that current stuff might be evicted earlier with no or little overcommit?

Rene.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux