On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:05 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: [snip] > Question: > Could those who have found this prefetch helps them alot say how > many disks they have? In particular, is their swap on the same > disk spindle as their root and user files? > > Answer - for me: > On my system where updatedb is a big problem, I have one, slow, disk. > On my system where updatedb is a small problem, swap is on a separate > spindle. > On my system where updatedb is -no- problem, I have so much memory > I never use swap. > > I'd expect the laptop crowd to mostly have a single, slow, disk, and > hence to find updatedb more painful. A well done swap-to-flash would help here. I sometimes do it anyway to a 4GB CF card but I can tell it's hitting the read/update/write cycles on the flash blocks. The sad thing is that it is still a speed improvement over swapping to laptop disk. -- Zan Lynx <[email protected]>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: [email protected]
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: [email protected]
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems with timerfd()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/7] lguest: documentation pt I: Preparation
- Previous by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Next by thread: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Index(es):