On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:50:50AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:43:47PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Hello Christoph:
> >
> > >>>+#include <asm/irq.h>
> >
> > >>These days that should probably be <linux/irq.h>.
> >
> > >Not at all, linux/irq.h is something entirely different.
> >
> > Actually, <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> Not for enable/disable_irq. For request_irq, yes.
>
> This is something that should be fixed.
Now it is... FWIW, I suspect that absolute majority of asm/irq.h
uses can be removed now.
Next steps in irq.h/interrupt.h cleanups:
* scouring asm/irq.h like it had been done for sparc32;
the parts that are only used by relevant arch/ code should be
taken there and includes _in_ asm/irq.h trimmed to minimum
* separating tasklet.h, with interrupt.h still including it.
Using it where needed.
* asm/softirq.h (with stuff mostly taken there from asm/hardirq.h)
and linux/softirq.h; again interrupt.h still should include it.
* mechanical adding include of linux/interrupt.h to files that use
request_irq/free_irq/enable_irq/disable_irq/irqreturn_t/IRQF_...
---> in the next merge window:
* replace include of linux/interrupt.h in netdevice.h with
that of linux/softirq.h.
* trim uses of linux/interrupt.h that are not needed anymore.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
