On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 06:31:32PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > +#include <asm/irq.h> > > These days that should probably be <linux/irq.h>. Not at all, linux/irq.h is something entirely different. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- References:
- [patch 0/3] m68k: -Werror-implicit-function-declaration fallout
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- [patch 0/3] m68k: -Werror-implicit-function-declaration fallout
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] run scripts/Lindent on it to match Documentation/CodingStyle
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] slub crashes with recent -git
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- Index(es):
 |