Hello Christoph:
+#include <asm/irq.h>
These days that should probably be <linux/irq.h>.
Not at all, linux/irq.h is something entirely different.
Actually, <linux/interrupt.h> WBR, Sergei - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- References:
- [patch 0/3] m68k: -Werror-implicit-function-declaration fallout
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Ralf Baechle <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [patch 0/3] m68k: -Werror-implicit-function-declaration fallout
- Prev by Date: Re: build fix for x86_64...
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] I/OAT: Add support for MSI and MSI-X
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 3/3] scsi: wd33c93 needs <asm/irq.h>
- Index(es):
 |