Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable

> > I fixed it all up
> 
> I have a sad little patch from Nick here which adds a new
> include/asm-x86_64/processor-cyrix.h.  I guess this patch broke the x86_64
> build.

I fixed that up too, but in a different way (just included asm-i386/processor-cyrix.h)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: TAKADA Yoshihito <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Juergen Beisert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Juergen Beisert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: posible latency issues in seq_read
• Next by Date: [PATCH] x86: Create clflush() inline, remove hardcoded wbinvd
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]